John Robert Miller
 |
|
• Baton Rouge, LA, USA |
|
• Registered on 12/21/2002 |
|
• 596 posts |
|
|
|
 Posted:11/28/2003 15:57 |
|
|
|
What's the difference between 3.2 and 4.0 mega-pixels? Is there enough of a difference to spend more on the 4.0? |
|
Herbert Vining Jr
 |
|
• Patterson, LA, USA |
|
• Registered on 11/19/2002 |
|
• 296 posts |
|
|
|
|
Posted:11/28/2003 16:09 |
|
|
I want to say the more megapixels the better the quality of the pictures, I'd go with the 4
1980 Bronco (Big Bertha / The Beast) 351M/C6/NP208/D44/9"/33's
My Bronco Site |
|
Swampy
 |
|
• New Orleans, LA, USA |
|
• Registered on 5/14/2003 |
|
• 964 posts |
|
|
|
|
Posted:11/28/2003 16:17 |
|
|
YOu are correct sir... The more mega pixles the bigger the picture which means better quality..
Depends on what you want to do.. I have a 2.3 ( I think) Megapixle camera and I am very happy with it.. I am not taking any magazine quality shots .. BUt I also am not afraid to take it in the woods and shoot pics of wheeling..
Carl
Eat , Drink, Mud... What else is there?
93 JEEP GRAND CHEROKEE ............
My imagestation (Red Creek)
http://www.imagestation.com/album/?id=4289664779
My Web Page..
http://home.bellsouth.net/p/s/community.dll?ep=16&groupid=94531&ck=
 |
|
John Robert Miller
|
|
• Baton Rouge, LA, USA |
|
• Registered on 12/21/2002 |
|
• 596 posts |
|
|
|
|
Posted:11/28/2003 16:29 |
|
|
|
I'm looking at the new Olympus Stylus series. They're weather proof so I'd be safe out doors and on the trail. It it worth the extra money for the four megapixels? |
|
Herbert Vining Jr
|
|
• Patterson, LA, USA |
|
• Registered on 11/19/2002 |
|
• 296 posts |
|
|
|
|
Posted:11/28/2003 16:50 |
|
|
I say yes but I guess it could be personal preference, you'd be fine with the 3.2, but if it were me and I had the extra money to spend I'd go with the 4, one day you might wanna take a picture of something a bit off in the distance, or in low light and might want that extra quality
1980 Bronco (Big Bertha / The Beast) 351M/C6/NP208/D44/9"/33's
My Bronco Site |
|
lee Alessi
 |
|
• Denham Springs, LA, USA |
|
• Registered on 6/3/2003 |
|
• 192 posts |
|
|
|
|
Posted:11/28/2003 16:58 |
|
|
im a camera nut. ive had 4
more megapixles give you the ability to crop more, and generally a little bigger PRINT size.
if you print large pics then 3 will give you 8x10, 4 and up gives you more. some of the larger megapixles also have more chrmatic aberrations, and noise and other issues.
i use a sony V-1
i plan on buying my wife a sony T-1
both are 5 megapixles |
|
John Robert Miller
|
|
• Baton Rouge, LA, USA |
|
• Registered on 12/21/2002 |
|
• 596 posts |
|
|
|
|
Posted:11/28/2003 17:35 |
|
|
|
Like with most things, I'm digital camera retarded. I appreciate the info. |
|
