SuperMotors.net Forums

Forums > Car and Truck Make and Model Specific > Mustang, Saleen, Roush
Performance Mufflers vs no mufflers
Thread Statistics:     Users to Post: 10   |   Total Posts: 11   |   Total Views: 4433
You must be logged in to post in or subscribe to this thread.Pages: 1 2
jim norman
• baltimore, MD, USA
• Registered on 11/5/2003
• 2 posts
Posted:11/5/2003 19:39
Quote:
I have a 96 Mustang GT 4.6L. In PA, state inspection requires mufflers. As it stands now, my exhaust system consists of Catalytic Converters and straight pipes out the back. The Catalytic Converters keep the db's down enough that it just doesn’t seem right to use mufflers at all. I just bought the car. The pervious owner lived in VA. It passed PA inspection because the mechanic did not check my exhaust system carefully, so I have some time to make my decision about what mufflers to buy.

I am running 2 1/4” pipe from the Catalytic converters back.

I’d like to get some input from other Mustang owners. If anyone would like to post his or her recommendations, or opinions I would appreciate your input. I have heard some positive opinions of “flowmaster” and “hooker” mufflers in a previous post that I placed in the General Discussion section of this forum.

I just recently acquired a 2000 gt with long headers, cats, Borla exhaust and H pipe. It passed Maryland Emission. cpaharley
Forums > Car and Truck Make and Model Specific > Mustang, Saleen, Roush
Performance Mufflers vs no mufflers
Thread Statistics:     Users to Post: 10   |   Total Posts: 11   |   Total Views: 4433
You must be logged in to post in or subscribe to this thread.Pages: 1 2

About SuperMotors | Contact Us | FAQ/Help | Legal
Copyright © 1998-2025 Web Design Solutions, Inc.
All rights reserved. Duplication & reproduction is strictly prohibited.
SuperMotors.net v5.0.2 ChangeLog