SuperMotors.net Forums
mpmitche
 |
|
• Golden, CO, USA |
|
• Registered on 7/8/2003 |
|
• 2 posts |
• 1 Vehicle
|
|
 Posted:7/8/2003 23:25 |
|
|
|
does a 95 f-150 with a 302 have a mass air? if so where is it? this is the model that has two hoses running form the airbox and nothing between that and the throtle body. If there is no mass air should i add one before making other upgrades (like intake and exhaust) |
|
BoulderBronco
 |
|
• Telluride, CO, USA |
|
• Registered on 7/6/2002 |
|
• 105 posts |
• 2 Vehicles
|
|
 Posted:7/10/2003 13:03 |
|
|
I am surprised but it sounds like you do not have Mass Air. I thought everything in 95 and 96 had it. But you don't need it to do upgrades. An intake and exhaust are perfect upgrades and are obvioulsy bolt on. What exhaust are you looking at getting?
93 Bronco,White/Green
Engine:
351W, 130 amp alternator, AGR High Pressure power steering pump, Custom K&N intakes, BroncoAir YORK on-board-air kit,
Drivetrain:
E4OD tranny, BW 1356 T-Case, 6" Superlift w/radius arms, Superlift Superrunner Steering Kit, D44 TTB front w/ARB, Warn Premium hubs, 4.88 gears, Ford 8.8 rear, custom CV driveshaft front, custom length driveshaft rear, 37" MTR's, BroncoAir Extreme Duty Winch Bumper, Warn M12000 winch,
Other: Lund Moon Visor, Tinted windows, PIAA 90Series fog/driving lights, full size spare, Uniden CB, kick ass stereo, Alpine MP3 head unit, CD/MP3 Changer, Orion amps, Boston 12" subs, MBQuart components.
Future: D60 front w/ custom coils, Sterling 10.25" rear, ARB's and 4.88's, full Bassani Exhaust/Header system, hopefully a supercharger but ya know it's all about the $$$$$$$$$
I am also the owner of BroncoAir
|
|
E. Long
 
 |
• Subscriber since 1/1/2001 |
|
• Atlanta, GA, USA |
|
• Registered on 1/23/2001 |
|
• 2,229 posts |
• 10 Vehicles
|
|
|
Posted:7/11/2003 20:21 |
|
|
From what I remember (at least with the full-size Broncos), the only 1995 vehicles that had mass-air were some California vehicles but all 1996 vehicles do have mass air. I would imagine that this would apply to F150s as well but Ford has been known to do some strange things... 
-Eric
'67 Galaxie 500 - 390 FE, .030" over, FE to AOD adapter, disc brake conversion. The Daily Driver.
'00 Excursion - 7.3L PSD, LANDYOT Gen-II Radius Rods, Factory Tech Valve Body, 200K+ miles and going |
|
mpmitche
|
|
• Golden, CO, USA |
|
• Registered on 7/8/2003 |
|
• 2 posts |
• 1 Vehicle
|
|
|
Posted:7/14/2003 12:00 |
|
|
|
for exhaust i'm thinking shorty headers and then dual 3" with glass packs and no more cats but i don't yet know if this is a good idea. |
|
E. Long
|
• Subscriber since 1/1/2001 |
|
• Atlanta, GA, USA |
|
• Registered on 1/23/2001 |
|
• 2,229 posts |
• 10 Vehicles
|
|
|
Posted:7/14/2003 17:52 |
|
|
| Quote: | | for exhaust i'm thinking shorty headers and then dual 3" with glass packs and no more cats but i don't yet know if this is a good idea. |
3" exhaust is way too big for that setup. For your 302, I would go with dual 2.25" exhaust. I would also consider full-length headers as opposed to the shorty's, you'll get a little better sound and power out of full-lengths. With regards to cats...it's up to you depending on what the local laws are, if you do go with them, Summit makes nice, cheap "high-flow" cats that'll work just fine. The glass packs will sound great with the headers.
-Eric
'67 Galaxie 500 - 390 FE, .030" over, FE to AOD adapter, disc brake conversion. The Daily Driver.
'00 Excursion - 7.3L PSD, LANDYOT Gen-II Radius Rods, Factory Tech Valve Body, 200K+ miles and going |
|
Steve Reilly
 |
|
• Fairfield, CT, USA |
|
• Registered on 4/7/2002 |
|
• 7 posts |
• 1 ATV
• 2 Vehicles
|
|
|
Posted:1/3/2005 11:34 |
|
|
|
I have a 1994 F-150 with the 5.0, and it hs mass air. Yours should be too. It should be right next to your air box. |
|
|
|
